SUPREME COURTChallenge to lawsuit ban rejectedThe Court this week refused to review the ban in the case of a world-class runner who was left crippled.By Jeff Nesmith DAYTON DAILY NEWSPublished: Saturday, October 11, 1997 Sidebar to Part 7
When the surgery was over, Jones was crippled, his chances of ever racing again ruined by what his lawyer charges was negligence in the operating room. But because Jones was an active duty sergeant in the Army, he cannot sue for medical malpractice. The U.S. Supreme Court this week turned down Jones' request that it review the 47-year-old Feres doctrine, which bars lawsuits for harm done to active duty members of the military.Jones in his petition to the court argued that his operation was unrelated to his service as an active-duty soldier. In 1992, Jones qualified for the Army track team and was transferred to the Presidio in San Francisco, along with other Army athletes. While in training for the Olympic trials that year, he developed ulcerative colitis, a painful stomach ailment, which eventually became so serious Army doctors decided to operate. When Jones awoke from the surgery, he couldn't walk. Burton Weinstein, his attorney, said pressurized stockings used to secure his legs during the operation had been applied too tightly and left on too long - seven hours too long. Jones suffered severe nerve damage and had to spend months in rehabilitation, learning how to use his legs again. The Army retired the track star on disability. "Now it is not only impossible for Donzell Jones to run, but it is also extremely difficult for him even to walk,'' Weinstein said in his petition to the Supreme Court. The court rejected the petition without comment.
|